cs.CR updates on arXiv.org

要約:
We study how runtime enforcement against unsafe actions affects end-to-end task performance in multi-step tool using large language model (LLM) agents. Using tau-bench across Airline and Retail domains, we compare baseline Tool-Calling, planning-integrated (TRIAD), and policy-mediated (TRIAD-SAFETY) architectures with GPT-OSS-20B and GLM-4-9B. We identify model dependent interaction horizons (15 to 30 turns) and decompose outcomes into overall success rate (SR), safe success rate (SSR), and unsafe success rate (USR). Our results reveal a persistent Safety Capability Gap. While safety mediation can intercept up to 94 percent of non-compliant actions, it rarely translates into strictly safe goal attainment (SSR below 5 percent in most settings). We find that high unsafe success rates are primarily driven by Integrity Leaks, where models hallucinate user identifiers to bypass mandatory authentication. Recovery rates following blocked actions are consistently low, ranging from 21 percent for GPT-OSS-20B in simpler procedural tasks to near zero in complex Retail scenarios. These results demonstrate that runtime enforcement imposes a significant verifier tax on conversational length and compute cost without guaranteeing safe completion, highlighting the critical need for agents capable of grounded identity verification and post-intervention reasoning.

要約:
The migration to post-quantum cryptography is urgent for Internet of Things devices with 10-20 year lifespans, yet no systematic benchmarks exist for the finalised NIST standards on the most constrained 32-bit processor class. This paper presents the first isolated algorithm-level benchmarks of ML-KEM (FIPS 203) and ML-DSA (FIPS 204) on ARM Cortex-M0+, measured on the RP2040 (Raspberry Pi Pico) at 133 MHz with 264 KB SRAM. Using PQClean reference C implementations, we measure all three security levels of ML-KEM (512/768/1024) and ML-DSA (44/65/87) across key generation, encapsulation/signing, and decapsulation/verification. ML-KEM-512 completes a full key exchange in 36.3 ms consuming 2.87 mJ--17x faster and 94% less energy than ECDH P-256 on the same hardware. ML-DSA signing exhibits high latency variance due to rejection sampling (coefficient of variation 61-71%, 99th-percentile up to 1,115 ms for ML-DSA-87). The M0+ incurs only a 1.8-1.9x slowdown relative to published Cortex-M4 results, despite lacking 64-bit multiply, DSP, and SIMD instructions. All code, data, and scripts are released as an open-source benchmark suite for reproducibility.

要約:
The increasing sophistication of cyber threats, especially zero-day attacks, poses a significant challenge to cybersecurity. Zero-day attacks exploit unknown vulnerabilities, making them difficult to detect and defend against. Existing approaches patch flaws and deploy an Intrusion Detection System (IDS). Using advanced Wasserstein GANs with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP), this paper makes a novel proposition to synthesize network traffic that mimics zero-day patterns, enriching data diversity and improving IDS generalization. SA-WGAN-GP is first introduced, which adds a Self-Attention (SA) mechanism to capture long-range cross-feature dependencies by reshaping the feature vector into tokens after dense projections. A JS-WGAN-GP is then proposed, which adds a Jensen-Shannon (JS) divergence-based auxiliary discriminator that is trained with Binary Cross-Entropy (BCE), frozen during updates, and used to regularize the generator for smoother gradients and higher sample quality. Third, SA-JS-WGAN-GP is created by combining the SA mechanism with JS divergence, thereby enhancing the data generation ability of WGAN-GP. As data augmentation does not equate with true zero-day attack discovery, we emulate zero-day attacks via the leave-one-attack-type-out method on the NSL-KDD dataset for training all GANs and IDS models in the assessment of the effectiveness of the proposed solution. The evaluation results show that integrating SA and JS divergence into WGAN-GP yields superior IDS performance and more effective zero-day risk detection.

要約:
Membership inference attacks (MIAs), which enable adversaries to determine whether specific data points were part of a model's training dataset, have emerged as an important framework to understand, assess, and quantify the potential information leakage associated with machine learning systems. Designing effective MIAs is a challenging task that usually requires extensive manual exploration of model behaviors to identify potential vulnerabilities. In this paper, we introduce AutoMIA -- a novel framework that leverages large language model (LLM) agents to automate the design and implementation of new MIA signal computations. By utilizing LLM agents, we can systematically explore a vast space of potential attack strategies, enabling the discovery of novel strategies. Our experiments demonstrate AutoMIA can successfully discover new MIAs that are specifically tailored to user-configured target model and dataset, resulting in improvements of up to 0.18 in absolute AUC over existing MIAs. This work provides the first demonstration that LLM agents can serve as an effective and scalable paradigm for designing and implementing MIAs with SOTA performance, opening up new avenues for future exploration.

要約:
Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on external tools (file operations, API calls, database transactions) to autonomously complete complex multi-step tasks. Practitioners deploy defense-trained models to protect against prompt injection attacks that manipulate agent behavior through malicious observations or retrieved content. We reveal a fundamental \textbf{capability-alignment paradox}: defense training designed to improve safety systematically destroys agent competence while failing to prevent sophisticated attacks. Evaluating defended models against undefended baselines across 97 agent tasks and 1,000 adversarial prompts, we uncover three systematic biases unique to multi-step agents. \textbf{Agent incompetence bias} manifests as immediate tool execution breakdown, with models refusing or generating invalid actions on benign tasks before observing any external content. \textbf{Cascade amplification bias} causes early failures to propagate through retry loops, pushing defended models to timeout on 99\% of tasks compared to 13\% for baselines. \textbf{Trigger bias} leads to paradoxical security degradation where defended models perform worse than undefended baselines while straightforward attacks bypass defenses at high rates. Root cause analysis reveals these biases stem from shortcut learning: models overfit to surface attack patterns rather than semantic threat understanding, evidenced by extreme variance in defense effectiveness across attack categories. Our findings demonstrate that current defense paradigms optimize for single-turn refusal benchmarks while rendering multi-step agents fundamentally unreliable, necessitating new approaches that preserve tool execution competence under adversarial conditions.

要約:
Security in LLM agents is inherently contextual. For example, the same action taken by an agent may represent legitimate behavior or a security violation depending on whose instruction led to the action, what objective is being pursued, and whether the action serves that objective. However, existing definitions of security attacks against LLM agents often fail to capture this contextual nature. As a result, defenses face a fundamental utility-security tradeoff: applying defenses uniformly across all contexts can lead to significant utility loss, while applying defenses in insufficient or inappropriate contexts can result in security vulnerabilities. In this work, we present a framework that systematizes existing attacks and defenses from the perspective of contextual security. To this end, we propose four security properties that capture contextual security for LLM agents: task alignment (pursuing authorized objectives), action alignment (individual actions serving those objectives), source authorization (executing commands from authenticated sources), and data isolation (ensuring information flows respect privilege boundaries). We further introduce a set of oracle functions that enable verification of whether these security properties are violated as an agent executes a user task. Using this framework, we reformalize existing attacks, such as indirect prompt injection, direct prompt injection, jailbreak, task drift, and memory poisoning, as violations of one or more security properties, thereby providing precise and contextual definitions of these attacks. Similarly, we reformalize defenses as mechanisms that strengthen oracle functions or perform security property checks. Finally, we discuss several important future research directions enabled by our framework.

要約:
An equidistribution is a theoretical quality criteria that measures the uniformity of a linear pseudo-random number generator (PRNG). In this work, we first show that all existing linear cellular automaton (CA) based pseudo-random number generators (PRNGs) are weak in the equidistribution characteristic. Then we propose a list of light-weight combined CA-based PRNGs with time spacing ($2 \leq s \leq 10$) using linear maximal length cellular automata of degree $31 \leq k \leq 128$ (close to computer word size). We show that these PRNGs achieve maximal period as well as satisfy the maximal equidistribution property. Finally, we show that these combined maximal length CA-based PRNGs pass almost all the empirical testbeds, with speed and performance comparable to the Mersenne Twister.

要約:
Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) remain difficult to detect due to their stealthy nature and long-term persistence. To tackle this challenge, provenance-based threat hunting has gained traction as a proactive defense mechanism. This technique models audit logs as a whole-system provenance graph and searches for subgraphs that match APT patterns recorded in Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) reports. However, several limitations persist: 1) significant memory and time overhead due to the extremely large provenance graphs; 2) imprecise segmentation of APT activities from provenance graphs due to their intricate entanglement with benign operations; and 3) poor alignment of attack representations between CTI-derived query graphs and provenance graphs due to their substantial semantic gaps. To address these limitations, this paper presents ProHunter, an efficient and accurate provenance-based APT hunting system with a platform-independent design. To minimize system overhead, ProHunter creates a compact data structure that efficiently stores long-term provenance graphs using semantic abstraction and bit-level hierarchical encoding strategies. To segment APT behaviors, a heuristic-driven threat graph sampling algorithm is designed, which can extract precise attack patterns from provenance graphs. Furthermore, to bridge the semantic gaps between CTI-derived graphs and provenance graphs, ProHunter proposes adaptive graph representation and feature enhancement methods, enabling the extraction of consistent attack semantics at both localized and globalized levels.Extensive evaluations on real-world APT campaigns from DARPA TC E3, E5 and OpTC datasets demonstrate that ProHunter outperforms state-of-the-art threat hunting systems in terms of efficiency and accuracy. Our code is available at https://github.com/xueboQiu/ProHunter.

要約:
As the Internet of Things (IoT) becomes an integral part of critical infrastructure, smart cities, and consumer networks, there has been an increase in the number of software attacks on the microcontrollers (MCUs) that constitute such networks. Runtime firmware attestation, i.e., the verification of a firmware's integrity, has become instrumental, and prior work focuses on lightweight IoT MCUs, offloading the verification task to capable remote verifiers. However, modern IoT devices feature large flash and volatile memory, on-device TinyML inference, and Trusted Execution Environments (TEE). Leveraging these capabilities, this paper presents a verifier-less, hybrid Self-Attestation (SA) framework called LiteAtt, which is based on TinyML execution in the Arm TrustZone of an IoT MCU for quick, on-device evaluation of the IoT firmware's SRAM footprint. LiteAtt takes a step towards ubiquitous intelligence and decentralized trust in IoT networks. It eliminates the need for firmware copies for attestation, and protects the privacy of user SRAM data by leveraging twin devices to train the TinyML models. The proposed framework achieves an average accuracy of 98.7%, F1 score of 99.33%, TPR of 98.72%, and TNR of 97.45% on SRAM attestation datasets collected from real devices. LiteAtt operates with a latency of 1.29ms, an energy consumption of 42.79uJ, and a runtime memory overhead of up to 32KB, which is suitable for battery-operated Arm Cortex-M devices. A security analysis is provided for the protocol regarding mutual authentication, confidentiality, integrity, SRAM privacy, and defense against replay and impersonation attacks. Practical deployment scenarios and future works are also discussed.

要約:
At SAC 2013, Berger et al. first proposed the Extended Generalized Feistel Networks (EGFN) structure for the design of block ciphers with efficient diffusion. Later, based on the Type-2 EGFN, they instantiated a new lightweight block cipher named Lilliput (published in IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol. 65, Issue 7, 2016). According to published cryptanalysis results, Lilliput is sufficiently secure against theoretical attacks such as differential, linear, boomerang, and integral attacks, which rely on the statistical properties of plaintext and ciphertext. However, there is a lack of analysis regarding its resistance to physical attacks in real-world scenarios, such as fault attacks. In this paper, we present the first systematic differential fault analysis (DFA) of Lilliput under three nibble-oriented fault models with progressively relaxed adversarial assumptions to comprehensively assess its fault resilience. In Model I (multi-round fixed-location), precise fault injections at specific rounds recover the master key with a 98% success rate using only 8 faults. Model II (single-round fixed-location) relaxes the multi-round requirement, demonstrating that 8 faults confined to a single round are still sufficient to achieve a 99% success rate by exploiting Lilliput's diffusion properties and DDT-based constraints. Model III (single-round random-location) further weakens the assumption by allowing faults to occur randomly among the eight rightmost branches of round 27. By uniquely identifying the fault location from ciphertext differences with high probability, the attack remains highly feasible, achieving over 99% success with 33 faults and exceeding 99.5% with 36 faults. Our findings reveal a significant vulnerability of Lilliput to practical fault attacks across different adversary capabilities in real-world scenarios, providing crucial insights for its secure implementation.

要約:
Serverless computing abstracts infrastructure management but also obscures system-level behaviors that can introduce security risks. Prior work has shown that serverless platforms are vulnerable to attacks exploiting shared execution environments, including attacker--victim co-location and denial-of-service through resource contention, yet analyzing these risks on production platforms is difficult due to limited observability, high cost, and lack of experimental control, while existing simulators primarily focus on performance and cost rather than security. We present Kumo, a security-focused simulator for serverless platforms that enables controlled, reproducible analysis of security risks arising from scheduling and resource sharing decisions. Kumo models invocation arrivals, scheduler placement, container reuse, resource contention, and queuing within a discrete-event framework, explicitly representing attackers and victims as first-class entities and providing metrics such as co-location probability, time to first co-location, invocation drop rate, and tail latency. Through two case studies, we show that scheduler choice is a first-order factor for co-location attacks, inducing orders-of-magnitude differences under identical workloads, while Denial-of-Service behavior is largely governed by system-level factors such as service time, queuing policy, and cluster capacity once contention dominates. These results highlight the need to distinguish scheduler-driven isolation risks from broader resource exhaustion vulnerabilities and position Kumo as a flexible foundation for systematic, security-aware exploration of serverless platforms.

要約:
The ability to simulate human privacy decisions has significant implications for aligning autonomous agents with individual intent and conducting cost-effective, large-scale privacy-centric user studies. Prior approaches prompt Large Language Models (LLMs) with natural language user statements, data-sharing histories, or demographic attributes to simulate privacy decisions. These approaches, however, fail to balance individual-level accuracy, prompt usability, token efficiency, and population-level representation. We present Narriva, an approach that generates text-based synthetic privacy personas to address these shortcomings. Narriva grounds persona generation in prior user privacy decisions, such as those from large-scale survey datasets, rather than purely relying on demographic stereotypes. It compresses this data into concise, human-readable summaries structured by established privacy theories. Through benchmarking across five diverse datasets, we analyze the characteristics of Narriva's synthetic personas in modeling both individual and population-level privacy preferences. We find that grounding personas in past privacy behaviors achieves up to 88% predictive accuracy (significantly outperforming a non-personalized LLM baseline), and yields an 80-95% reduction in prompt tokens compared to in-context learning with raw examples. Finally, we demonstrate that personas synthesized from a single survey can reproduce the aggregate privacy behaviors and statistical distributions (TVComplement up to 0.85) of entirely different studies.

要約:
Devices employing cryptographic approaches have to be resistant to physical attacks. Side-Channel Analysis (SCA) and Fault Injection (FI) attacks are frequently used to reveal cryptographic keys. In this paper, we present a combined SCA and laser illumination attack against an Elliptic Curve Scalar Multiplication accelerator using a differential probe from Teledyne LeCroy. Our experiments show that laser illumination increases the power consumption of the chip, especially its static power consumption but the success of the horizontal power analysis attacks was changed insignificantly. We assume that using a laser with a high laser beam power and concentrating on measuring and analysing only static current can improve the attack success significantly. The horizontal attacks against public key cryptosystems exploiting the Static Consumption under Laser Illumination (SCuLI attacks) are novel and their potential is not investigated yet. These attacks can be especially dangerous against cryptographic chips manufactured in scaled technologies. If such attacks are feasible, appropriate countermeasures have to be proposed in the future.

要約:
Formal patterns are formally specified solutions to frequently occurring distributed system problems that are generic, executable, and come with strong qualitative and/or quantitative formal guarantees. A formal pattern is a generic system transformation which transforms a usually infinite class of systems in need of the pattern's solution into enhanced versions of such systems that solve the problem in question. In this paper we demonstrate the application of formal patterns to protocol dialects. Dialects are methods for hardening protocols so as to endow them with light-weight security, especially against easy attacks that can lead to more serious ones. A lingo is a dialect's key security component, because attackers are unable to ''speak'' the lingo. A lingo's ''talk'' changes all the time, becoming a moving target for attackers. In this paper we present several formal patterns for both lingos and dialects. Lingo formal patterns can make lingos stronger by both transforming them and by composing several lingos into a stronger lingo. Dialects themselves can be obtained by the application of a single dialect formal pattern, generic on both the chosen lingo and the chosen protocol.

要約:
Privacy-preserving aggregation is a cornerstone for AI systems that learn from distributed data without exposing individual records, especially in federated learning and telemetry. Existing two-server protocols (e.g., Prio and successors) set a practical baseline by validating inputs while preventing any single party from learning users' values, but they impose symmetric costs on both servers and communication that scales with the per-client input dimension $L$. Modern learning tasks routinely involve dimensionalities $L$ in the tens to hundreds of millions of model parameters. We present TAPAS, a two-server asymmetric private aggregation scheme that addresses these limitations along four dimensions: (i) no trusted setup or preprocessing, (ii) server-side communication that is independent of $L$ (iii) post-quantum security based solely on standard lattice assumptions (LWE, SIS), and (iv) stronger robustness with identifiable abort and full malicious security for the servers. A key design choice is intentional asymmetry: one server bears the $O(L)$ aggregation and verification work, while the other operates as a lightweight facilitator with computation independent of $L$. This reduces total cost, enables the secondary server to run on commodity hardware, and strengthens the non-collusion assumption of the servers. One of our main contributions is a suite of new and efficient lattice-based zero-knowledge proofs; to our knowledge, we are the first to establish privacy and correctness with identifiable abort in the two-server setting.

要約:
Wireless networks are highly vulnerable to spoofing attacks, especially when attackers transmit consecutive spoofing packets. Conventional physical layer authentication (PLA) methods have mostly focused on single-packet spoofing attack. However, under consecutive spoofing attacks, they become ineffective due to channel evolution caused by device mobility and channel fading. To address this challenge, we propose a channel prediction-based PLA framework. Specifically, a Transformer-based channel prediction module is employed to predict legitimate CSI measurements during spoofing interval, and the input of channel prediction module is adaptively updated with predicted or observed CSI measurements based on the authentication decision to ensure robustness against sustained spoofing. Simulation results under Rayleigh fading channels demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves low prediction error and significantly higher authentication accuracy than conventional benchmark, maintaining robustness even under extended spoofing attacks.

要約:
Autonomous coding agents are increasingly integrated into software development workflows, offering capabilities that extend beyond code suggestion to active system interaction and environment management. OpenClaw, a representative platform in this emerging paradigm, introduces an extensible skill ecosystem that allows third-party developers to inject behavioral guidance through lifecycle hooks during agent initialization. While this design enhances automation and customization, it also opens a novel and unexplored attack surface. In this paper, we identify and systematically characterize guidance injection, a stealthy attack vector that embeds adversarial operational narratives into bootstrap guidance files. Unlike traditional prompt injection, which relies on explicit malicious instructions, guidance injection manipulates the agent's reasoning context by framing harmful actions as routine best practices. These narratives are automatically incorporated into the agent's interpretive framework and influence future task execution without raising suspicion.We construct 26 malicious skills spanning 13 attack categories including credential exfiltration, workspace destruction, privilege escalation, and persistent backdoor installation. We evaluate them using ORE-Bench, a realistic developer workspace benchmark we developed. Across 52 natural user prompts and six state-of-the-art LLM backends, our attacks achieve success rates from 16.0% to 64.2%, with the majority of malicious actions executed autonomously without user confirmation. Furthermore, 94% of our malicious skills evade detection by existing static and LLM-based scanners. Our findings reveal fundamental tensions in the design of autonomous agent ecosystems and underscore the urgent need for defenses based on capability isolation, runtime policy enforcement, and transparent guidance provenance.

要約:
In traditional runtime verification, a system is typically observed by a monolithic monitor. Enforcing privacy in such settings is computationally expensive, as it necessitates heavy cryptographic primitives. Therefore, privacy-preserving monitoring remains impractical for real-time applications. In this work, we address this scalability challenge by distributing the monitor across multiple parties -- at least one of which is honest. This architecture enables the use of efficient secret-sharing schemes instead of computationally intensive cryptography, dramatically reducing over-head while maintaining strong privacy guarantees. While existing secret-sharing approaches are typically limited to one-shot executions which do not maintain an internal state, we introduce a protocol tailored for continuous monitoring that supports repeated evaluations over an evolving internal state (kept secret from the system and the monitoring entities). We implement our approach using the MP-SPDZ framework. Our experiments demonstrate that, under these architectural assumptions, our protocol is significantly more scalable than existing alternatives.

要約:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely deployed, especially through free Web-based applications that expose them to diverse user-generated inputs, including those from long-tail distributions such as low-resource languages and encrypted private data. This open-ended exposure increases the risk of jailbreak attacks that undermine model safety alignment. While recent studies have shown that leveraging long-tail distributions can facilitate such jailbreaks, existing approaches largely rely on handcrafted rules, limiting the systematic evaluation of these security and privacy vulnerabilities. In this work, we present EvoJail, an automated framework for discovering long-tail distribution attacks via multi-objective evolutionary search. EvoJail formulates long-tail attack prompt generation as a multi-objective optimization problem that jointly maximizes attack effectiveness and minimizes output perplexity, and introduces a semantic-algorithmic solution representation to capture both high-level semantic intent and low-level structural transformations of encryption-decryption logic. Building upon this representation, EvoJail integrates LLM-assisted operators into a multi-objective evolutionary framework, enabling adaptive and semantically informed mutation and crossover for efficiently exploring a highly structured and open-ended search space. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EvoJail consistently discovers diverse and effective long-tail jailbreak strategies, achieving competitive performance with existing methods in both individual and ensemble level.

要約:
Hamming Quasi-Cyclic (HQC) was chosen for the latest post-quantum cryptography standardization. A concatenated Reed-Muller (RM) and Reed-Solomon (RS) code is decoded during the HQC decryption. Soft-decision RS decoders achieve better error-correcting performance than hard-decision decoders and accordingly shorten the required codeword and key lengths. However, the only soft-decision decoder for HQC in prior works is an erasure-only decoder, which has limited coding gain. This paper analyzes other hardware-friendly soft-decision RS decoders and discovers that the generalized minimum-distance (GMD) decoder can better utilize the soft information available in HQC. Extending the Agrawal-Vardy bound for the scenario of HQC, it was found that the RS codeword length for HQC-128 can be reduced from 46 to 36. This paper also proposes efficient GMD decoder hardware architectures optimized for the short and low-rate RS codes used in HQC. The HQC-128 decryption utilizing the proposed GMD decoder achieves 20% and 15% reductions on the latency and area, respectively, compared to the decryption with hard-decision decoders.

要約:
The use of ML in cybersecurity has long been impaired by generalization issues: Models that work well in controlled scenarios fail to maintain performance in production. The root cause often lies in ML algorithms learning superficial patterns (shortcuts) rather than underlying cybersecurity concepts. We investigate contrastive multi-modal learning as a first step towards improving ML performance in cybersecurity tasks. We aim at transferring knowledge from data-rich modalities, such as text, to data-scarce modalities, such as payloads. We set up a case study on threat classification and propose a two-stage multi-modal contrastive learning framework that uses textual vulnerability descriptions to guide payload classification. First, we construct a semantically meaningful embedding space using contrastive learning on descriptions. Then, we align payloads to this space, transferring knowledge from text to payloads. We evaluate the approach on a large-scale private dataset and a synthetic benchmark built from public CVE descriptions and LLM-generated payloads. The methodology appears to reduce shortcut learning over baselines on both benchmarks. We release our synthetic benchmark and source code as open source.

要約:
While differentially private (DP) fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) is a powerful tool, it is often computationally prohibitive or infeasible when state-of-the-art models are only accessible via proprietary APIs. In such settings, generating DP synthetic data has emerged as a crucial alternative, offering the added benefits of arbitrary reuse across downstream tasks and transparent exploratory data analysis without the opaque constraints of a model's parameter space. Private Evolution (PE) is a promising API-based framework for this goal; however, its performance critically depends on initialization. When the private data distribution deviates substantially from the foundation model's pre-training priors--particularly in highly specialized domains--PE frequently struggles to align with the target data, resulting in degraded utility, poor convergence, and inefficient API usage. To address this initialization bottleneck, we propose Metadata Augmented Private Language Evolution (MAPLE). MAPLE leverages differentially private tabular metadata extraction and in-context learning to effectively ground the initial synthetic distribution in the target domain. Extensive experiments on challenging, domain-specific text generation tasks demonstrate that MAPLE achieves a significantly more favorable privacy-utility trade-off, converges faster, and drastically reduces API costs compared to previous PE methods.

要約:
In the modern financial system, combating money laundering is a critical challenge complicated by data privacy concerns and increasingly complex fraud transaction patterns. Although federated learning (FL) is a promising problem-solving approach as it allows institutions to train their models without sharing their data, it has the drawback of being prone to privacy leakage, specifically in tabular data forms like financial data. To address this, we propose DPxFin, a novel federated framework that integrates reputation-guided adaptive differential privacy. Our approach computes client reputation by evaluating the alignment between locally trained models and the global model. Based on this reputation, we dynamically assign differential privacy noise to client updates, enhancing privacy while maintaining overall model utility. Clients with higher reputations receive lower noise to amplify their trustworthy contributions, while low-reputation clients are allocated stronger noise to mitigate risk. We validate DPxFin on the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) dataset under both IID and non-IID settings using Multi Layer Perceptron (MLP). Experimental analysis established that our approach has a more desirable trade-off between accuracy and privacy than those of traditional FL and fixed-noise Differential Privacy (DP) baselines, where performance improvements were consistent, even though on a modest scale. Moreover, DPxFin does withstand tabular data leakage attacks, proving its effectiveness under real-world financial conditions.

要約:
We develop a variational encrypted model predictive control (VEMPC) protocol whose online execution relies only on encrypted polynomial operations. The proposed approach reformulates the MPC problem into a sampling-based estimator, in which the computation of the quadratic cost is naturally handled by tilting the sampling distribution, thus reducing online encrypted computation. The resulting protocol requires no additional communication rounds or intermediate decryption, and scales efficiently through two complementary levels of parallelism. We analyze the effect of encryption-induced errors on optimality, and simulation results demonstrate the practical applicability of the proposed method.

要約:
Graph pattern counting serves as a cornerstone of network analysis with extensive real-world applications. Its integration with local differential privacy (LDP) has gained growing attention for protecting sensitive graph information in decentralized settings. However, existing LDP frameworks are largely ad hoc, offering solutions only for specific patterns such as triangles and stars. A general mechanism for counting arbitrary graph patterns, even for the subclass of acyclic patterns, has remained an open problem. To fill this gap, we present the first general solution for counting arbitrary acyclic patterns under LDP. We identify and tackle two fundamental challenges: generalizing pattern construction from distributed data and eliminating node duplication during the construction. To address the first challenge, we propose an LDP-tailored recursive subpattern counting framework that incrementally builds patterns across multiple communication rounds. For the second challenge, we apply a random marking technique that restricts each node to a unique position in the pattern during computation. Our mechanism achieves strong utility guarantees: for any acyclic graph pattern with $k$ edges, we achieve an additive error of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{N}d(G)^k)$, where $N$ is the number of nodes and $d(G)$ is the maximum degree of the input graph $G$. Experiments on real-world graph datasets across multiple types of acyclic patterns demonstrate that our mechanisms achieve up to $46$-$2600\times$ improvement in utility and $300$-$650\times$ reduction in communication cost compared to the baseline methods.

要約:
Penetration testing, the practice of simulating cyberattacks to identify vulnerabilities, is a complex sequential decision-making task that is inherently partially observable and features large action spaces. Training reinforcement learning (RL) policies for this domain faces a fundamental bottleneck: existing simulators are too slow to train on realistic network scenarios at scale, resulting in policies that fail to generalize. We present NASimJax, a complete JAX-based reimplementation of the Network Attack Simulator (NASim), achieving up to 100x higher environment throughput than the original simulator. By running the entire training pipeline on hardware accelerators, NASimJax enables experimentation on larger networks under fixed compute budgets that were previously infeasible. We formulate automated penetration testing as a Contextual POMDP and introduce a network generation pipeline that produces structurally diverse and guaranteed-solvable scenarios. Together, these provide a principled basis for studying zero-shot policy generalization. We use the framework to investigate action-space scaling and generalization across networks of up to 40 hosts. We find that Prioritized Level Replay better handles dense training distributions than Domain Randomization, particularly at larger scales, and that training on sparser topologies yields an implicit curriculum that improves out-of-distribution generalization, even on topologies denser than those seen during training. To handle linearly growing action spaces, we propose a two-stage action decomposition (2SAS) that substantially outperforms flat action masking at scale. Finally, we identify a failure mode arising from the interaction between Prioritized Level Replay's episode-reset behaviour and 2SAS's credit assignment structure. NASimJax thus provides a fast, flexible, and realistic platform for advancing RL-based penetration testing.

要約:
Forecasting plays a crucial role in modern safety-critical applications, such as space operations. However, the increasing use of deep forecasting models introduces a new security risk of trojan horse attacks, carried out by hiding a backdoor in the training data or directly in the model weights. Once implanted, the backdoor is activated by a specific trigger pattern at test time, causing the model to produce manipulated predictions. We focus on this issue in our \textit{Trojan Horse Hunt} data science competition, where more than 200 teams faced the task of identifying triggers hidden in deep forecasting models for spacecraft telemetry. We describe the novel task formulation, benchmark set, evaluation protocol, and best solutions from the competition. We further summarize key insights and research directions for effective identification of triggers in time series forecasting models. All materials are publicly available on the official competition webpage https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/trojan-horse-hunt-in-space.

要約:
Getting a real cybersecurity risk assessment for a small organization is expensive -- a NIST CSF-aligned engagement runs $15,000 on the low end, takes weeks, and depends on practitioners who are genuinely scarce. Most small companies skip it entirely. We built a six-agent AI system where each agent handles one analytical stage: profiling the organization, mapping assets, analyzing threats, evaluating controls, scoring risks, and generating recommendations. Agents share a persistent context that grows as the assessment proceeds, so later agents build on what earlier ones concluded -- the mechanism that distinguishes this from standard sequential agent pipelines. We tested it on a 15-person HIPAA-covered healthcare company and compared outputs to independent assessments by three CISSP practitioners -- the system agreed with them 85% of the time on severity classifications, covered 92% of identified risks, and finished in under 15 minutes. We then ran 30 repeated single-agent assessments across five synthetic but sector-realistic organizational profiles in healthcare, fintech, manufacturing, retail, and SaaS, comparing a general-purpose Mistral-7B against a domain fine-tuned model. Both completed every run. The fine-tuned model flagged threats the baseline could not see at all: PHI exposure in healthcare, OT/IIoT vulnerabilities in manufacturing, platform-specific risks in retail. The full multi-agent pipeline, however, failed every one of 30 attempts on a Tesla T4 with its 4,096-token default context window -- context capacity, not model quality, turned out to be the binding constraint.

要約:
The popularity of large language models (LLMs) continues to grow, and LLM-based assistants have become ubiquitous. Information security awareness (ISA) is an important yet underexplored area of LLM safety. ISA encompasses LLMs' security knowledge, which has been explored in the past, as well as their attitudes and behaviors, which are crucial to LLMs' ability to understand implicit security context and reject unsafe requests that may cause an LLM to unintentionally fail the user. We introduce LISAA, a comprehensive framework to assess LLM ISA. The proposed framework applies an automated measurement method to a comprehensive set of 100 realistic scenarios covering all security topics in an ISA taxonomy. These scenarios create tension between implicit security implications and user satisfaction. Applying our LISAA framework to leading LLMs highlights a widespread vulnerability affecting current deployments: many popular models exhibit only medium to low ISA levels, exposing their users to cybersecurity threats, and models that rank highly in cybersecurity knowledge benchmarks sometimes achieve relatively low ISA ranking. In addition, we found that smaller variants of the same model family are significantly riskier. Furthermore, while newer model versions demonstrated notable improvements, meaningful gaps in their ISA persist, suggesting that there is room for improvement. We release an online tool that implements our framework and enables the evaluation of new models.

要約:
Conventional double-spending attack models ignore the revenue losses stemming from the orphan blocks. On the other hand, selfish mining literature usually ignores the chance of the attacker to double-spend at no-cost in each attack cycle. In this paper, we give a rigorous stochastic analysis of an attack where the goal of the adversary is to double-spend while mining selfishly. To do so, we first combine stubborn and selfish mining attacks, \textit{i.e.}, construct a strategy where the attacker acts stubborn until its private branch reaches a certain length and then switches to act selfish. We provide the optimal stubbornness for each parameter regime. Next, we provide the maximum stubbornness that is still more profitable than honest mining and argue a connection between the level of stubbornness and the $k$-confirmation rule. We show that, at each attack cycle, if the level of stubbornness is higher than $k$, the adversary gets a free shot at double-spending. At each cycle, for a given stubbornness level, we rigorously formulate how great the probability of double-spending is. We further modify the attack in the stubborn regime in order to conceal the attack and increase the double-spending probability.

要約:
Confidentiality for business data is an understudied area of disclosure avoidance, where legacy methods struggle to provide acceptable results. Standard formal privacy techniques for person-level data, like differential privacy, are designed to protect against membership inference and hence do not provide suitable confidentiality/utility trade-offs due to the highly skewed nature of business data and because extreme outlier records are often important contributors to query answers. Prior proposals, therefore, took a personalized differential privacy approach that allowed privacy parameters to degrade for the outlying records -- larger establishments get weaker membership inference guarantees. However, providing guarantees to some entities that are strictly weaker than guarantees for others is problematic from a policy standpoint. In this paper, we propose a novel confidentiality framework for business data with a focus on interpretability for policy makers. Instead of protecting against membership inference, which is often not a concern in business data, we protect against attribute inferences that are too precise. In our framework, data curators specify a neighbor function that is used to define uncertainty interval bands around an establishment's attribute values and the privacy parameters govern the strength of indistinguishability between values within the same uncertainty interval.We propose two query-answering mechanisms under this framework and evaluate them on: (1) a confidential Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) dataset produced by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (this was done through a cooperative agreement), and (2) a substitute dataset that we created from public sources (and will publicly release).

要約:
In this paper, we introduce a metadata-enriched generation framework (PhishFuzzer) that seeds real emails into Large Language Models (LLMs) to produce 23,100 diverse, structurally consistent email variants across controlled entity and length dimensions. Unlike prior corpora, our dataset features strict three-class labels (Phishing, Spam, Valid), provides full URL and attachment metadata, and annotates each email with attacker intent. Using this dataset, we benchmark two state-of-the-art LLMs (Qwen-2.5-72B and Gemini-3.1-Pro) under both Basic (body, subject) and Full (+URL, sender, attachment) settings. By applying formal confidence metrics (Task Success Rate and Confidence Index), we analyze model reliability, robustness against linguistic fuzzing, and the impact of structural metadata on detection accuracy. Our fully open-source framework and dataset provide a rigorous foundation for evaluating next-generation email security systems. To support open science, we make the PhishFuzzer Dataset, the generation scripts and prompts available on GitHub: https://github.com/DataPhish/PhishFuzzer

要約:
The exponential growth of data collection necessitates robust privacy protections that preserve data utility. We address information disclosure against adversaries with bounded prior knowledge, modeled by an entropy constraint $H(X) \geq b$. Within this information privacy framework -- which replaces differential privacy's independence assumption with a bounded-knowledge model -- we study three core problems: maximal per-record leakage, the primal leakage-distortion tradeoff (minimizing worst-case leakage under distortion $D$), and the dual distortion minimization (minimizing distortion under leakage constraint $L$). These problems resemble classical information-theoretic ones (channel capacity, rate-distortion) but are more complex due to high dimensionality and the entropy constraint. We develop efficient alternating optimization algorithms that exploit convexity-concavity duality, with theoretical guarantees including local convergence for the primal problem and convergence to a stationary point for the dual. Experiments on binary symmetric channels and modular sum queries validate the algorithms, showing improved privacy-utility tradeoffs over classical differential privacy mechanisms. This work provides a computational framework for auditing privacy risks and designing certified mechanisms under realistic adversary assumptions.

要約:
Passkeys -- discoverable WebAuthn credentials synchronised across devices are widely promoted as the future of passwordless authentication. Built on the FIDO2 standard, they eliminate shared secrets and resist phishing while offering usability through platform credential managers. Since their introduction in 2022, major vendors have integrated passkeys into operating systems and browsers, and prominent websites have announced support. Yet the true extent of adoption across the broader web remains unknown. Measuring this is challenging because websites implement passkeys in heterogeneous ways. Some expose explicit "Sign in with passkey" buttons, others hide options under multi-step flows or rely on conditional mediation, and many adopt external mechanisms such as JavaScript libraries or OAuth-based identity providers. There is no standardised discovery endpoint, and dynamic, JavaScript-heavy pages complicate automated detection. This paper makes two contributions. First, we present Fidentikit, a browser-based crawler implementing 43 heuristics across five categories - UI elements, DOM structures, WebAuthn API calls, network patterns, and library detection - developed through iterative refinement over 1,500 sites. Second, we apply Fidentikit to the top 100,000 Tranco-ranked domains, producing the first large-scale census of passkey adoption. Our results show adoption strongly correlates with site popularity and often depends on external identity providers rather than native implementations.

要約:
AI agents dynamically acquire tools, orchestrate sub-agents, and transact across organizational boundaries, yet no existing security layer verifies what an agent can do, whether it executed what it claims, or what happened in a multi-agent interaction. We trace this gap to the capability-context separation: inside a transformer, tool definitions and user context are indistinguishable tokens, but at the orchestration layer they have fundamentally different security semantics. Existing frameworks conflate the two, enabling silent capability escalation and leaving interactions without verifiable provenance. From this principle we derive three Agent Governance Requirements: capability integrity (G1), behavioral verifiability (G2), and interaction auditability (G3), defining what a governed agent ecosystem must enforce, independent of how. We prove two structural results: the Chain Verifiability Theorem (one unverifiable interior agent breaks end-to-end verification for all downstream nodes) and the Bounded Divergence Theorem (replay-based verification yields a probabilistic safety certificate, epsilon <= 1 - alpha^{1/n}). We validate with two crypto-agnostic instantiations -- basic (Ed25519, SHA-256; 97 us verify) and enhanced (BBS+ selective disclosure, Groth16 DV-SNARK; 13.8 ms) -- both satisfying nine security properties. A reproducibility study (9 models, 7 providers) reveals 5.8x variance in inference determinism, connecting model characteristics to governance architecture. End-to-end evaluation over 5-20 agent pipelines confirms <0.02% overhead and detection of all attack scenarios with zero false positives.

要約:
Autonomous LLM-based agents increasingly operate as long-running processes forming densely interconnected multi-agent ecosystems, whose security properties remain largely unexplored. In particular, OpenClaw, an open-source platform with over 40,000 active instances, has stood out recently with its persistent configurations, tool-execution privileges, and cross-platform messaging capabilities. In this work, we present ClawWorm, the first self-replicating worm attack against a production-scale agent framework, achieving a fully autonomous infection cycle initiated by a single message: the worm first hijacks the victim's core configuration to establish persistent presence across session restarts, then executes an arbitrary payload upon each reboot, and finally propagates itself to every newly encountered peer without further attacker intervention. We evaluate the attack on a controlled testbed across four distinct LLM backends, three infection vectors, and three payload types (1,800 total trials). We demonstrate a 64.5\% aggregate attack success rate, sustained multi-hop propagation, and reveal stark divergences in model security postures -- highlighting that while execution-level filtering effectively mitigates dormant payloads, skill supply chains remain universally vulnerable. We analyse the architectural root causes underlying these vulnerabilities and propose defence strategies targeting each identified trust boundary. Code and samples will be released upon completion of responsible disclosure.

要約:
Investigating cybersecurity incidents requires collecting and analyzing evidence from multiple log sources, including intrusion detection alerts, network traffic records, and authentication events. This process is labor-intensive: analysts must sift through large volumes of data to identify relevant indicators and piece together what happened. We present a RAG-based system that performs security incident analysis through targeted query-based filtering and LLM semantic reasoning. The system uses a query library with associated MITRE ATT&amp;CK techniques to extract indicators from raw logs, then retrieves relevant context to answer forensic questions and reconstruct attack sequences. We evaluate the system with five LLM providers on malware traffic incidents and multi-stage Active Directory attacks. We find that LLM models have different performance and tradeoffs, with Claude Sonnet 4 and DeepSeek V3 achieving 100% recall across all four malware scenarios, while DeepSeek costs 15 times less ($0.008 vs. $0.12 per analysis). Attack step detection on Active Directory scenarios reaches 100% precision and 82% recall. Ablation studies confirm that a RAG architecture is essential: LLM baselines without RAG-enhanced context correctly identify victim hosts but miss all attack infrastructure including malicious domains and command-and-control servers. These results demonstrate that combining targeted query-based filtering with RAG-based retrieval enables accurate, cost-effective security analysis within LLM context limits.

要約:
Cloud-hosted large language models (LLMs) have become the de facto planners in agentic systems, coordinating tools and guiding execution over local environments. In many deployments, however, the environment being planned over is private, containing source code, files, credentials, and metadata that cannot be exposed to the cloud. Existing solutions address adjacent concerns, such as execution isolation, access control, or confidential inference, but they do not control what cloud planners observe during planning: within the permitted scope, \textit{raw environment state is still exposed}. We introduce PlanTwin, a privacy-preserving architecture for cloud-assisted planning without exposing raw local context. The key idea is to project the real environment into a \textit{planning-oriented digital twin}: a schema-constrained and de-identified abstract graph that preserves planning-relevant structure while removing reconstructable details. The cloud planner operates solely on this sanitized twin through a bounded capability interface, while a local gatekeeper enforces safety policies and cumulative disclosure budgets. We further formalize the privacy-utility trade-off as a capability granularity problem, define architectural privacy goals using $(k,\delta)$-anonymity and $\epsilon$-unlinkability, and mitigate compositional leakage through multi-turn disclosure control. We implement PlanTwin as middleware between local agents and cloud planners and evaluate it on 60 agentic tasks across ten domains with four cloud planners. PlanTwin achieves full sensitive-item non-disclosure (SND = 1.0) while maintaining planning quality close to full-context systems: three of four planners achieve PQS $> 0.79$, and the full pipeline incurs less than 2.2\% utility loss.

要約:
Agent Control Protocol (ACP) is a formal technical specification for governance of autonomous agents in B2B institutional environments. ACP is the admission control layer between agent intent and system state mutation: before any agent action reaches execution, it must pass a cryptographic admission check that validates identity, capability scope, delegation chain, and policy compliance simultaneously. ACP defines the mechanisms of cryptographic identity, capability-based authorization, deterministic risk evaluation, verifiable chained delegation, transitive revocation, and immutable auditing that a system must implement for autonomous agents to operate under explicit institutional control. ACP operates as an additional layer on top of RBAC and Zero Trust, without replacing them. It is designed specifically for the problem that neither model solves: governing what an autonomous agent can do, under what conditions, with what limits, and with complete traceability for external auditing -- including across organizational boundaries. The v1.14 specification comprises 36 technical documents organized into five conformance levels (L1-L5). It includes a Go reference implementation of 22 packages covering all L1-L4 capabilities, 73 signed conformance test vectors (Ed25519 + SHA-256), and an OpenAPI 3.1.0 specification for all HTTP endpoints. It defines more than 62 verifiable requirements, 12 prohibited behaviors, and the mechanisms for interoperability between institutions. Specification and implementation: https://github.com/chelof100/acp-framework-en

要約:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) poses a significant threat to web application security. While Deep Learning (DL) has shown remarkable success in detecting XSS attacks, it remains vulnerable to adversarial attacks due to the discontinuous nature of the mapping between the input (i.e., the attack) and the output (i.e., the prediction of the model whether an input is classified as XSS or benign). These adversarial attacks employ mutation-based strategies for different components of XSS attack vectors, allowing adversarial agents to iteratively select mutations to evade detection. Our work replicates a state-of-the-art XSS adversarial attack, highlighting threats to validity in the reference work and extending it towards a more effective evaluation strategy. Moreover, we introduce an XSS Oracle to mitigate these threats. The experimental results show that our approach achieves an escape rate above 96% when the threats to validity of the replicated technique are addressed.

要約:
AI-text detectors face a critical robustness challenge: adversarial paraphrasing attacks that preserve semantics while evading detection. We introduce StealthRL, a reinforcement learning framework that stress-tests detector robustness under realistic adversarial conditions. StealthRL trains a paraphrase policy against a multi-detector ensemble using Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with LoRA adapters on Qwen3-4B, optimizing a composite reward that balances detector evasion with semantic preservation. We evaluate six attack settings (M0-M5) on the full filtered MAGE test pool (15,310 human / 14,656 AI) against four detectors: RoBERTa, Fast-DetectGPT, Binoculars, and MAGE. StealthRL achieves near-zero detection on three of the four detectors and a 0.024 mean TPR@1%FPR, reducing mean AUROC from 0.79 to 0.43 and attaining a 97.6% attack success rate. Critically, attacks transfer to two held-out detectors not seen during training, revealing shared architectural vulnerabilities rather than detector-specific brittleness. We additionally conduct LLM-based quality evaluation via Likert scoring on 500 matched samples per method, analyze detector score distributions to explain why evasion succeeds, and provide per-detector AUROC with bootstrap confidence intervals. Our results expose significant robustness gaps in current AI-text detection and establish StealthRL as a principled adversarial evaluation protocol. Code and evaluation pipeline are publicly available at https://github.com/suraj-ranganath/StealthRL.

要約:
Language models remain vulnerable to prompt injection attacks despite extensive safety training. We trace this failure to role confusion: models infer roles from how text is written, not where it comes from. We design novel role probes to capture how models internally identify "who is speaking." These reveal why prompt injection works: untrusted text that imitates a role inherits that role's authority. We test this insight by injecting spoofed reasoning into user prompts and tool outputs, achieving average success rates of 60% on StrongREJECT and 61% on agent exfiltration, across multiple open- and closed-weight models with near-zero baselines. Strikingly, the degree of internal role confusion strongly predicts attack success before generation begins. Our findings reveal a fundamental gap: security is defined at the interface but authority is assigned in latent space. More broadly, we introduce a unifying, mechanistic framework for prompt injection, demonstrating that diverse prompt-injection attacks exploit the same underlying role-confusion mechanism.